Thursday 11 June 2015

WHITE GENOCIDE SOUTH AFRICA MARCH 2015 – GOVERNMENT CRIMINALITY vs THE REAL TRUTH REVEALED.


WHITE GENOCIDE MARCH 2015 FINAL

facebook1-29.jpg

JOIN MORE THAN 1500 WHITE CONSERVATIVE VOICES FROM AROUND THE WORLD ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
Statistics compiled by: White Nation Editorial Team.
 RELATED LINKS:
THE BBC DISCOVERS WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA
VIOLENT ATTACKS AND MURDERS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE IN SOUTH AFRICA- MARCH 2015.
VIOLENT ATTACKS: 72
MURDERS: 18
TOTAL ATTACKS AND MURDERS ON WHITES SO FAR FOR 2015:
BRUTAL ATTACKS: 215
MURDERS: 62
 (Please take note that this only reflects the reported cases we could trace on media and social sites that were high-lighted. Many cases do not even get reported due to a vicious onslaught by the ANC regime to silence reports on murders and attacks on whites by blacks.Other again- are reported late.Thus it is quite difficult to determine precisely the amount each month-end.  This is the closest we can get to the real figures.Due to murders and attacks committed on a daily basis- these figures keep on adding and changing. Thus no accurate figure could be produced- but this we have- was what our team could trace across tens of websites and newspapers.  – White Nation Team)

SOUTH AFRICA- FAILED LAND OF COMMUNIST ANC DECEPTION AND WHITE GENOCIDE.
VIDEO: THE END GAME- FULL WHITE GENOCIDE DOCUMENTARY
NOTORIOUS HONORS
South Africa is ostensibly rated  among the top most dangerous countries in the world.In February 2007, the Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation was contracted by the South African government to carry out a study on the nature of crime in South Africa. The study concluded that the country is exposed to high levels of violence as a result of different factors, including” Why South Africa is so violent and what we should be doing about it” – Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. (Link) Among that ghoulish and notorious list of dangerous countries- South Africa tops the list when it comes to genocide against whites- bar none–  PERIOD!
SILENCING THE LAMBS- PLAYING DIRTY:  HIDE  AND DOWNPLAY THE FACTS
The South African ruling despot regime of Zuma is but trying it utmost to silence the facts. The regime pulled out all the stops in various ways of trying to curb the flow of reports on white murders such as setting up a Human Rights Commission to prosecute white activists for so-called “hate speech” if they report this cases- or even show pictures of murdered farmers/whites. (Link) and (Link) Methods like silencing the media on reporting the race were enforced- bogus false Facebook profiles were created with sleaze-bucked nameless and faceless G-Men reporting any white website that report murders- were set up. One such a site can be viewed here: ( Link) . White murders even were de-classified from priority category willful farm murders to  “natural causes” on death certificates. According to newspaper reports recently unearthed by several rights groups in South Africa, murders of South African whites are being disguised by issuing death certificates showing that they had died of “natural causes”. At least three such cases have come to light. (Link)
Another method of stemming the flow of reports is attacks on white websites by G-Men hackers, spamming the sites, attacks by viruses, closing down sites- and conspire with Facebook to close such sites under the false pretense of “hate speech”– the most recent addition of anti-white “laws” the ANC communists fabricate and add to their already HUGE arsenal of anti-white weaponry to suppress white genocide reporting. Police stats on farm murders were cooked- and re-classified as “ normal crime ” to prevent the true reflection. Other sinister methods such as meddling with the case, loosing court dockets- and purposefully messing up crime scenes by policemen , disappearing of crucial evidence and  are too often reported as well. Then there also is the absolute unnatural  reluctance of the police to reveal aspects on certain “mysterious” deaths as well- as with the case of the Stellenbosch Van Breda triple murder- (Link) Then also there is the deliberate attacks launched by the government controlled media against white activists by setting up white liberal operators to act as “ concerned Afrikaners“- and attack/ridicule or demonize  activists in the media.  (Link)– or the downplay that South African murders and crime is not as “bad “ as some other countries in the world- eg. Britain. (Link) Britain- by the way- has  a LONG way to go to even come close to South Africa with respect to crime.
 DEATH RATE IN SOUTH AFRICA  TOPPING MIDDLE-EAST
In a recent report- The White Human Rights Group-Afriforum – stated that more murders are committed  in SA than in the war in Iraq against ISIS . The report states that approximately 300 more murders per month are committed in South Africa in comparison to the death toll as a result of the war against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Iraq. According to AfriForum, about 1 400 murders take place in South Africa every month, while the death toll in Iraq rose steeply during February with more than 1 103 deaths. However, it is still less than the monthly figure in South Africa. The death toll in Iraq for February was announced this past week by Nickolay Mladenov of the United Nations (UN).
South Africa has a tendency of a war zone when it comes to murder figures. According to the 2013/2014 crime statistics of South Africa, approximately 47 murders are committed on a daily basis in the country, in other words there are about 1 400 per month,” said Ian Cameron, Head of Community Safety at AfriForum.
According to Cameron, the comparison is important seeing as it serves as evidence that the police in South Africa is losing the battle against violent crime and that South Africans should start looking after their safety themselves. Cameron further mentioned that according to the Iraq Body Count (IBC) about 17 049 people lost their lives in Iraq during 2014 and according to the 2013/2014 statistics of the South African Police Service (SAPS), 17 068 in South Africa. These figures indicate that it is not too farfetched to compare South Africa with a war-stricken area.
“There where the police is doing its best to combat crime, we must doing everything in our ability to help, but communities should take responsibility themselves with regards to their safety. The state fails in its duty to safeguard citizens,” concluded Cameron.

 (Please also visit HERE for more factual information on the white genocide in South Africa)
 SOUTH AFRICA- HOW BAD IS THE WHITE GENOCIDE THEN?
More than 70 000 whites have been brutally murdered since the ANC hi-jack of the country in 19994. More than 4000 white farmers paid the ultimate price- and more than 600 000 whites were pushed into squatter camps through racist AA and BEEE laws coming from the communists in the ANC such as Rob Davis. A full list of whites murdered by blacks since 1994 can be viewed here: (Link) Most of these murders is straight forward hate crimes. Robbery is not the motive- but the sheer barbarism involved fueled by misplaced hatred advocated by the likes of Zuma and Malema. Read the accounts of cases at the bottom of the page- and observe the brutality with which these murders are committed against feeble and defenseless old people, women and children. THEN ask yourself the question whether we are dealing here with humans- or ravaging monsters?
If you start to concentrate and investigate the multiple white murders since 1994- you immediately will pick up that “scarlet thread” that runs through the area and time-line. Every month we see about the same amount of attacks, about the same amount of murders- and always more-or-less the same areas like De Wildt, Warmbaths, Standerton and  Memel  popping up on a continuous basis. Lately most of these attacks involve alien Zimbabweans. There may be just a motive behind this. We suspect Zimbabweans- because of their alien origin and not registered as South Africans- are being used as a “third force” by the regime to “cull” white farmers to accelerate their land restitution program. Zimbabweans are mostly untraceable- and can disappear more easily across the border as with the case of local blacks. We suspect this was the case of the assassination of Eugene Terreblanche by the ANC NI as well- placing the blame on an alien Zimbabwean. He disappeared from the scene since…either got murdered- or sent back to Zimbabwe….but we never heard of him again.
WHITE GENOCIE 1
WHAT IS A GENOCIDE THEN- GENOCIDE WATCH STATES:
The Ten Stages of Genocide
By Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide WatchClassification Symbolization Discrimination Dehumanization Organization
Polarization Preparation Persecution Extermination Denial
Genocide is a process that develops in ten stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Stages may occur simultaneously. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.
1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Catholic church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.
2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies”, or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia. To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Bulgaria, where the government refused to supply enough yellow badges and at least eighty percent of Jews did not wear them, depriving the yellow star of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.
3. DISCRIMINATION: A dominant group uses law, custom, and political power to deny the rights of other groups. The powerless group may not be accorded full civil rights or even citizenship. Examples include the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 in Nazi Germany, which stripped Jews of their German citizenship, and prohibited their employment by the government and by universities. Denial of citizenship to the Rohingya Muslim minority in Burma is another example. Prevention against discrimination means full political empowerment and citizenship rights for all groups in a society. Discrimination on the basis of nationality, ethnicity, race or religion should be outlawed. Individuals should have the right to sue the state, corporations, and other individuals if their rights are violated.
4. DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. In combating this dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than democracies. Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen. Hate radio stations should be shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.
5. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, often using militias to provide deniability of state responsibility (the Janjaweed in Darfur.) Sometimes organization is informal (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants) or decentralized (terrorist groups.) Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. To combat this stage, membership in these militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel. The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations, as was done in post-genocide Rwanda.
6. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions.
7. PREPARATION: National or perpetrator group leaders plan the “Final Solution” to the Jewish, Armenian, Tutsi or other targeted group “question.” They often use euphemisms to cloak their intentions, such as referring to their goals as “ethnic cleansing,” “purification,” or “counter-terrorism.” They build armies, buy weapons and train their troops and militias. They indoctrinate the populace with fear of the victim group. Leaders often claim that “if we don’t kill them, they will kill us.” Prevention of preparation may include arms embargos and commissions to enforce them. It should include prosecution of incitement and conspiracy to commit genocide, both crimes under Article 3 of the Genocide Convention.
8. PERSECUTION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. In state sponsored genocide, members of victim groups may be forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is often expropriated. Sometimes they are even segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. Genocidal massacres begin. They are acts of genocide because they intentionally destroy part of a group. At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or the U.N. Security Council can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.
9. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces — should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. is paralyzed, regional alliances must act. It is time to recognize that the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.
10. DENIAL is the final stage that lasts throughout and always follows a genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies,
  • try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses.
  • They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims.
  • They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them. The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav or Rwanda Tribunals, or an international tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or an International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice.

No comments:

Post a Comment